Tham khảo Kinh_tế_học_phi_chính_thống

  1. Fred E. Foldvary, ed., 1996. Beyond Neoclassical Economics: Heterodox Approaches to Economic Theory, Edward Elgar. Description and contents B&N.com links.
  2. 1 2 Frederic S. Lee, 2008. "heterodox economics," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition, v. 4, pp. 2–65. Abstract.
  3. In the order listed at JEL classification codes § B. History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches, JEL: B5 – Current Heterodox Approaches.
  4. Lawson, T. (2005). “The nature of heterodox economics” (PDF). Cambridge Journal of Economics. 30 (4): 483–505. doi:10.1093/cje/bei093.
  5. C. Barry, 1998. Political-economy: A comparative approach. Westport, CT: Praeger.[cần số trang]
  6. John B. Davis (2006). "Heterodox Economics, the Fragmentation of the Mainstream, and Embedded Individual Analysis", in Future Directions in Heterodox Economics, p. 57. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  7. Among these economists, Robert M. Solow names Austrian, Post-Keynesian, Marxist, and neo-Ricardian schools as on "dissenting fringes of academic economics". Solow continued that "In economics, nevertheless, there is usually a definite consensus—there is one now." Further:
  8. Cohn, Steve (2003). “Common Ground Critiques of Neoclassical Principles Texts”. Post-Autistic Economics Review (18, article 3).
  9. Mearman, Andrew (2011). "Who Do Heterodox Economists Think They Are?" American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 70(2): 480–510.
Kinh tế học vĩ mô
Kinh tế học vi mô
Các phân ngành
Phương pháp luận
Lịch sử
tư tưởng kinh tế
Các nhà kinh tế học
nổi tiếng
Các tổ chức quốc tế